↓ Skip to main content

SAPPHIRE: a neural network based classifier for σ70 promoter prediction in Pseudomonas

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SAPPHIRE: a neural network based classifier for σ70 promoter prediction in Pseudomonas
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12859-020-03730-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas Coppens, Rob Lavigne

Abstract

In silico promoter prediction represents an important challenge in bioinformatics as it provides a first-line approach to identifying regulatory elements to support wet-lab experiments. Historically, available promoter prediction software have focused on sigma factor-associated promoters in the model organism E. coli. As a consequence, traditional promoter predictors yield suboptimal predictions when applied to other prokaryotic genera, such as Pseudomonas, a Gram-negative bacterium of crucial medical and biotechnological importance. We developed SAPPHIRE, a promoter predictor for σ70 promoters in Pseudomonas. This promoter prediction relies on an artificial neural network that evaluates sequences on their similarity to the - 35 and - 10 boxes of σ70 promoters found experimentally in P. aeruginosa and P. putida. SAPPHIRE currently outperforms established predictive software when classifying Pseudomonas σ70 promoters and was built to allow further expansion in the future. SAPPHIRE is the first predictive tool for bacterial σ70 promoters in Pseudomonas. SAPPHIRE is free, publicly available and can be accessed online at www.biosapphire.com . Alternatively, users can download the tool as a Python 3 script for local application from this site.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 21 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Computer Science 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 24 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,345,731
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,482
of 7,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,364
of 431,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#35
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.