You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Structural coercion in the context of community engagement in global health research conducted in a low resource setting in Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-020-00530-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah Nyirenda, Salla Sariola, Patricia Kingori, Bertie Squire, Chiwoza Bandawe, Michael Parker, Nicola Desmond |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 21% |
| Malawi | 5 | 11% |
| South Africa | 4 | 9% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Guinea | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 51% |
| Scientists | 20 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 19 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,212,313
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#81
of 1,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,102
of 432,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.