↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: The effect of soluble E-selectin on tumor progression and metastasis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: The effect of soluble E-selectin on tumor progression and metastasis
Published in
BMC Cancer, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12885-016-2391-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shin-Ae Kang, Celine A. Blache, Sandra Bajana, Nafis Hasan, Mohamed Kamal, Yoshihiro Morita, Vineet Gupta, Bilegtsaikhan Tsolmon, K. Stephen Suh, David G. Gorenstein, Wajeeha Razaq, Hallgeir Rui, Takemi Tanaka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,334,427
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#6,505
of 8,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,488
of 351,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#174
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,325 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.