↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating a theory-driven group-based complex intervention versus usual physiotherapy to support self-management of osteoarthritis and low back pain (SO…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating a theory-driven group-based complex intervention versus usual physiotherapy to support self-management of osteoarthritis and low back pain (SOLAS)
Published in
Trials, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13063-020-04671-x
Authors

Deirdre A. Hurley, Isabelle Jeffares, Amanda M. Hall, Alison Keogh, Elaine Toomey, Danielle McArdle, Suzanne M. McDonough, Suzanne Guerin, Ricardo Segurado, James Matthews

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Master 10 14%
Other 6 8%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 27 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 29 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,882,461
of 18,974,311 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#2,224
of 4,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,460
of 319,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,974,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them