↓ Skip to main content

Affect, risk perception, and the use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes: a population study of U.S. adults

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Affect, risk perception, and the use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes: a population study of U.S. adults
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-5306-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy Popova, Daniel Owusu, Scott R. Weaver, Catherine B. Kemp, C. K. Mertz, Terry F. Pechacek, Paul Slovic

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 30 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Psychology 9 9%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 38 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,633,726
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,566
of 15,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,774
of 332,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#273
of 315 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 315 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.