You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual-assisted treadmill training for locomotor recovery post-stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-6-18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelly P Westlake, Carolynn Patten |
| Abstract |
While manually-assisted body-weight supported treadmill training (BWSTT) has revealed improved locomotor function in persons with post-stroke hemiparesis, outcomes are inconsistent and it is very labor intensive. Thus an alternate treatment approach is desirable. Objectives of this pilot study were to: 1) compare the efficacy of body-weight supported treadmill training (BWSTT) combined with the Lokomat robotic gait orthosis versus manually-assisted BWSTT for locomotor training post-stroke, and 2) assess effects of fast versus slow treadmill training speed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 409 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 392 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 75 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 11% |
| Researcher | 46 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 80 | 20% |
| Unknown | 79 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 106 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 24 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 9% |
| Unknown | 98 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2012.
All research outputs
#18,313,878
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#981
of 1,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,920
of 111,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.