You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Geographical influences on the iodine status in pregnant women, neonates, and school-age children in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-020-0525-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaoming Lou, Xiaofeng Wang, Guangming Mao, Wenming Zhu, Zhe Mo, Yuanyang Wang, Zhifang Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 24 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2020.
All research outputs
#6,269,033
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#839
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,364
of 455,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.