You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implications for post critical illness trial design: sub-phenotyping trajectories of functional recovery among sepsis survivors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03275-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zudin A. Puthucheary, Jochen S. Gensichen, Aylin S. Cakiroglu, Richard Cashmore, Lara Edbrooke, Christoph Heintze, Konrad Neumann, Tobias Wollersheim, Linda Denehy, Konrad F. R. Schmidt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 37% |
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Japan | 2 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 56% |
| Scientists | 6 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 42 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 46 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,296,753
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,022
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,539
of 430,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#56
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.