| Title |
Lessons from an ICU recovery clinic: two cases of meralgia paresthetica after prone positioning to treat COVID-19-associated ARDS and modification of unit practices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03289-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy L. Bellinghausen, Jamie N. LaBuzetta, Frank Chu, Francesca Novelli, Anthony R. Rodelo, Robert L. Owens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 7 | 11% |
| United States | 6 | 10% |
| Argentina | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 29 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 13% |
| Scientists | 5 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 36 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 38 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#835,742
of 25,529,543 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#624
of 6,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,692
of 432,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#17
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,529,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.