↓ Skip to main content

New insights into family relationships within the avian superfamily Sylvioidea (Passeriformes) based on seven molecular markers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
53 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New insights into family relationships within the avian superfamily Sylvioidea (Passeriformes) based on seven molecular markers
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-12-157
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silke Fregin, Martin Haase, Urban Olsson, Per Alström

Abstract

The circumscription of the avian superfamily Sylvioidea is a matter of long ongoing debate. While the overall inclusiveness has now been mostly agreed on and 20 families recognised, the phylogenetic relationships among the families are largely unknown. We here present a phylogenetic hypothesis for Sylvioidea based on one mitochondrial and six nuclear markers, in total ~6.3 kbp, for 79 ingroup species representing all currently recognised families and some species with uncertain affinities, making this the most comprehensive analysis of this taxon.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Lithuania 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 52 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 24%
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Master 11 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 20%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Computer Science 2 3%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,754,661
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,503
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,775
of 186,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#18
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.