You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic comparison of chloroplast genome assembly tools
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-020-02153-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan A. Freudenthal, Simon Pfaff, Niklas Terhoeven, Arthur Korte, Markus J. Ankenbrand, Frank Förster |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 10% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 65% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 24% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
| Psychology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 40 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,058,398
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,281
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,314
of 432,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#55
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.