↓ Skip to main content

The dubious value of cerebrospinal fluid adenosine deaminase measurement for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The dubious value of cerebrospinal fluid adenosine deaminase measurement for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12879-017-2221-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pieter Ekermans, Adriano Dusé, Jaya George

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 35%
Neuroscience 5 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#18,753,253
of 23,245,494 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,694
of 7,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,744
of 421,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#123
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,245,494 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.