You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policy-makers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12961-020-00624-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chantelle Garritty, Candyce Hamel, Mona Hersi, Claire Butler, Zarah Monfaredi, Adrienne Stevens, Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit, Wei Cheng, David Moher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 45% |
Canada | 1 | 9% |
Ireland | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
Researcher | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Librarian | 3 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 19% |
Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
Computer Science | 5 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 24 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,786,691
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#890
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,132
of 432,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#27
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.