↓ Skip to main content

Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policy-makers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policy-makers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12961-020-00624-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chantelle Garritty, Candyce Hamel, Mona Hersi, Claire Butler, Zarah Monfaredi, Adrienne Stevens, Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit, Wei Cheng, David Moher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 5 9%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Librarian 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 20 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Computer Science 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 24 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,786,691
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#890
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,132
of 432,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#27
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.