You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association between firearms and mortality in Brazil, 1990 to 2017: a global burden of disease Brazil study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Population Health Metrics, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12963-020-00222-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah Carvalho Malta, Adauto Martins Soares Filho, Isabella Vitral Pinto, Maria Cecília de Souza Minayo, Cheila Marina Lima, Ísis Eloah Machado, Renato Azeredo Teixeira, Otaliba Libânio Morais Neto, Roberto Marini Ladeira, Edgar Merchan-Hamann, Maria de Fatima Marinho de Souza, Cíntia Honório Vasconcelos, Carlos Cezar Flores Vidotti, Ewerton Cousin, Scott Glenn, Catherine Bisignano, Adrienne Chew, Antonio Luiz Ribeiro, Mohsen Naghavi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 14 | 26% |
| United States | 10 | 19% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 2% |
| Aruba | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 91% |
| Scientists | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 12% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#357,007
of 25,410,626 outputs
Outputs from Population Health Metrics
#12
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,746
of 432,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Health Metrics
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,410,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.