↓ Skip to main content

Potential Diagnostic Systems for Coronavirus Detection: a Critical Review

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Procedures Online, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 181)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Potential Diagnostic Systems for Coronavirus Detection: a Critical Review
Published in
Biological Procedures Online, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12575-020-00134-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Ekrami, Mahdi Pouresmaieli, Fatemeh Barati, Sahar Asghari, Farzad Ramezani Ziarani, Parvin Shariati, Matin Mamoudifard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 32 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Chemistry 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 34 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,653,659
of 24,682,395 outputs
Outputs from Biological Procedures Online
#26
of 181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,970
of 405,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Procedures Online
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,682,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 181 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.