You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lessons learned about the effective operationalization of champions as an implementation strategy: results from a qualitative process evaluation of a pragmatic trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-020-01048-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arwen E. Bunce, Inga Gruß, James V. Davis, Stuart Cowburn, Deborah Cohen, Jee Oakley, Rachel Gold |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 45% |
| Canada | 4 | 13% |
| Ireland | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 55% |
| Scientists | 11 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 38 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 41 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,721,174
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#307
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,341
of 434,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#12
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.