You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of nitrogen-fixing bacteria to improve agricultural productivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Proceedings, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1753-6561-8-s4-o23 |
| Authors |
Emanuel Maltempi Souza, Leda Satie Chubatsu, Luciano F Huergo, Rose Monteiro, Doumit Camilios-Neto, Roseli Wassem, Fábio de Oliveira Pedrosa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 34 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,627,117
of 23,245,494 outputs
Outputs from BMC Proceedings
#97
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,213
of 254,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Proceedings
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,245,494 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.