You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A narrative review of economic constructs in commonly used implementation and scale-up theories, frameworks and models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-020-00633-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brown Vicki, Tran Huong, Blake Miranda, Laws Rachel, Moodie Marj |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 36% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,460,483
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#169
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,618
of 410,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#3
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.