↓ Skip to main content

Application of ultrasound artificial intelligence in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions of BI-RADS 4A

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of ultrasound artificial intelligence in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions of BI-RADS 4A
Published in
BMC Cancer, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12885-020-07413-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sihua Niu, Jianhua Huang, Jia Li, Xueling Liu, Dan Wang, Ruifang Zhang, Yingyan Wang, Huiming Shen, Min Qi, Yi Xiao, Mengyao Guan, Haiyan Liu, Diancheng Li, Feifei Liu, Xiuming Wang, Yu Xiong, Siqi Gao, Xue Wang, Jiaan Zhu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 20 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Computer Science 3 9%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Unknown 20 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2020.
All research outputs
#18,753,253
of 23,245,494 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,501
of 8,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,971
of 412,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#77
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,245,494 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,420 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.