You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Retroclavicular vs Infraclavicular block for brachial plexus anesthesia: a multi-centric randomized trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12871-019-0868-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrés Felipe Gil Blanco, Pascal Laferrière-Langlois, David Jessop, Frédérick D’Aragon, Yanick Sansoucy, Natalie Albert, Pascal Tétreault, Pablo Echave |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 21% |
India | 2 | 11% |
Belgium | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Peru | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 32% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Researcher | 2 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 13 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 48% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,247,437
of 25,362,278 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#97
of 1,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,205
of 376,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,704 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.