| Title |
The impact of COVID-19 control measures on social contacts and transmission in Kenyan informal settlements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-020-01779-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew Quaife, Kevin van Zandvoort, Amy Gimma, Kashvi Shah, Nicky McCreesh, Kiesha Prem, Edwine Barasa, Daniel Mwanga, Beth Kangwana, Jessie Pinchoff, W. John Edmunds, Christopher I. Jarvis, Karen Austrian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 40% |
| United States | 5 | 13% |
| Kenya | 5 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 5% |
| Senegal | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 48% |
| Scientists | 17 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 333 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 16% |
| Researcher | 52 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 15% |
| Unknown | 106 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 77 | 23% |
| Unknown | 114 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,238,247
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#866
of 4,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,696
of 434,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#27
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.