↓ Skip to main content

Application of two different nasal CPAP levels for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants—“The OPTTIMMAL-Trial”—Optimizing PEEP To The IMMAture Lungs: study protocol of a…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of two different nasal CPAP levels for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants—“The OPTTIMMAL-Trial”—Optimizing PEEP To The IMMAture Lungs: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13063-020-04660-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Waitz, Corinna Engel, Rolf Schloesser, Ulrich Rochwalsky, Sascha Meyer, Alexander Larsen, Paul Hoffmann, Michael Zemlin, Bettina Bohnhorst, Corinna Peter, Marc Hoppenz, Thomas Pabst, Klaus-Peter Zimmer, Axel R. Franz, Christoph Haertel, Eric Frieauff, Julia Sandkötter, Katja Masjosthusmann, Philipp Deindl, Dominique Singer, Melanie Heidkamp, Annesuse Schmidt, Harald Ehrhardt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 34 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Unspecified 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 34 47%