| Title |
Evidence of a wide gap between COVID-19 in humans and animal models: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03304-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Salleh N. Ehaideb, Mashan L. Abdullah, Bisher Abuyassin, Abderrezak Bouchama |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 50% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 158 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 53 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 11 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 63 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,866,037
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,671
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,576
of 434,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#43
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.