You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Determinants of an evidence-based practice environment: an interpretive description
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s43058-020-00070-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jed Duff, Laura Cullen, Kirsten Hanrahan, Victoria Steelman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Belgium | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,838,737
of 25,554,853 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#185
of 548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,079
of 435,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#18
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,554,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.