↓ Skip to main content

Impact of poroelasticity of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of poroelasticity of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress of abdominal aortic aneurysms
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-925x-11-62
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stanislav Polzer, T Christian Gasser, Bernd Markert, Jiri Bursa, Pavel Skacel

Abstract

The predictions of stress fields in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) depend on constitutive descriptions of the aneurysm wall and the Intra-luminal Thrombus (ILT). ILT is a porous diluted structure (biphasic solid-fluid material) and its impact on AAA biomechanics is controversially discussed in the literature. Specifically, pressure measurements showed that the ILT cannot protect the wall from the arterial pressure, while other (numerical and experimental) studies showed that at the same time it reduces the stress in the wall.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 49 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 30%
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 25 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#607
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,714
of 187,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.