You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of neurofilament light chain in the cerebrospinal fluid and blood as a biomarker for neuronal damage in experimental pneumococcal meningitis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Neuroinflammation, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12974-020-01966-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ngoc Dung Le, Lukas Muri, Denis Grandgirard, Jens Kuhle, David Leppert, Stephen L. Leib |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 17 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 20% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 18 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,276,574
of 23,245,494 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#812
of 2,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,038
of 414,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#77
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,245,494 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.