↓ Skip to main content

Adequacy of iodine intake in three different Japanese adult dietary patterns: a nationwide study

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adequacy of iodine intake in three different Japanese adult dietary patterns: a nationwide study
Published in
Nutrition Journal, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12937-015-0116-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryoko Katagiri, Keiko Asakura, Ken Uechi, Shizuko Masayasu, Satoshi Sasaki

Abstract

Iodine intake is considered to be high in Japan due to regular seaweed consumption. Subgroups that do not have a traditional Japanese-style diet may consume insufficient amounts of iodine. Three hundred and ninety apparently healthy adults (195 men and 195 women) aged 20 to 69 years from 20 areas throughout Japan completed four-day diet records and collected a 24-h urine sample. Dietary patterns were extracted from 31 food groups by cluster analysis. The iodine adequacy of each dietary pattern was examined using reference values from the Dietary Reference Intakes for Japanese. Three dietary patterns, labelled "Cluster I (Rice and vegetables)" (n = 101), "Cluster II (Meat, non-Japanese noodles, and sugar-sweetened beverages)" (n = 34), and "Cluster III (Fish, Japanese noodles, and alcohol)" (n = 60), were identified in male subjects. Another set of three patterns, "Cluster I (Rice and vegetables)" (n = 22), "Cluster II (Fish and Japanese noodles)" (n = 33), and "Cluster III (Bread and non-Japanese noodles)" (n = 140), was found in female subjects. Although the habitual iodine intake of almost all participants was above the estimated average requirement (EAR), iodine intake was statistically significantly lowest in Cluster II in men and Cluster III in women. Moreover, the mean participant age was the youngest in these clusters. Although Japan is known as a high iodine-consuming country, some Japanese individuals who do not eat a traditional Japanese-style diet consume low amounts of iodine. Since younger people tend to have modern, Westernized dietary patterns, iodine deficiency might be given additional consideration hereafter in Japan.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 25 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 27 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,497,185
of 25,824,818 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#690
of 1,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,709
of 402,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,824,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.