↓ Skip to main content

Advancing understanding and identifying strategies for sustaining evidence-based practices: a review of reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 X users

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advancing understanding and identifying strategies for sustaining evidence-based practices: a review of reviews
Published in
Implementation Science, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13012-020-01040-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah A. Birken, Emily R. Haines, Soohyun Hwang, David A. Chambers, Alicia C. Bunger, Per Nilsen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Professor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 19 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 17%
Social Sciences 9 14%
Psychology 8 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,673,144
of 25,138,857 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#309
of 1,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,951
of 423,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,138,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.