↓ Skip to main content

Impact of hematologic malignancy and type of cancer therapy on COVID-19 severity and mortality: lessons from a large population-based registry study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hematology & Oncology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 1,217)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
296 Mendeley
Title
Impact of hematologic malignancy and type of cancer therapy on COVID-19 severity and mortality: lessons from a large population-based registry study
Published in
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13045-020-00970-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julio García-Suárez, Javier de la Cruz, Ángel Cedillo, Pilar Llamas, Rafael Duarte, Víctor Jiménez-Yuste, José Ángel Hernández-Rivas, Rodrigo Gil-Manso, Mi Kwon, Pedro Sánchez-Godoy, Pilar Martínez-Barranco, Blanca Colás-Lahuerta, Pilar Herrera, Laurentino Benito-Parra, Adrián Alegre, Alberto Velasco, Arturo Matilla, María Concepción Aláez-Usón, Rafael Martos-Martínez, Carmen Martínez-Chamorro, Keina Susana-Quiroz, Juan Francisco Del Campo, Adolfo de la Fuente, Regina Herráez, Adriana Pascual, Elvira Gómez, Jaime Pérez-Oteyza, Elena Ruiz, Arancha Alonso, José González-Medina, Lucía Núñez Martín-Buitrago, Miguel Canales, Isabel González-Gascón, María Carmen Vicente-Ayuso, Susana Valenciano, María García Roa, Pablo Estival Monteliu, Javier López-Jiménez, Cristián Escolano Escobar, Javier Ortiz-Martín, José Luis Diez-Martin, Joaquín Martinez-Lopez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 296 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 11%
Student > Master 28 9%
Researcher 26 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 8%
Other 17 6%
Other 52 18%
Unknown 115 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 28 9%
Unknown 128 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,082,295
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#47
of 1,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,298
of 416,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.