↓ Skip to main content

Risk of African swine fever introduction into the European Union through transport-associated routes: returning trucks and waste from international ships and planes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk of African swine fever introduction into the European Union through transport-associated routes: returning trucks and waste from international ships and planes
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-8-149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lina Mur, Beatriz Martínez-López, José Manuel Sánchez-Vizcaíno

Abstract

The uncontrolled presence of African swine fever (ASF) in Russian Federation (RF) poses a serious risk to the whole European Union (EU) pig industry. Although trade of pigs and their products is banned since the official notification in June 2007, the potential introduction of ASF virus (ASFV) may occur by other routes, which are very frequent in ASF, and more difficult to control, such as contaminated waste or infected vehicles. This study was intended to estimate the risk of ASFV introduction into the EU through three types of transport routes: returning trucks, waste from international ships and waste from international planes, which will be referred here as transport-associated routes (TAR). Since no detailed and official information was available for these routes, a semi-quantitative model based on the weighted combination of risk factors was developed to estimate the risk of ASFV introduction by TAR. Relative weights for combination of different risk factors as well as validation of the model results were obtained by an expert opinion elicitation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 140 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 19%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Other 11 8%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 39 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,205,554
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#503
of 3,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,352
of 187,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#13
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,298 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.