You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring how and why Care Groups work to improve infant feeding practices in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01497-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pieternella Pieterse, Anne Matthews, Aisling Walsh, Ellen Chirwa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 50 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2020.
All research outputs
#18,756,555
of 23,248,929 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,802
of 2,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,372
of 416,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#48
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,248,929 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.