Title |
Acute kidney injury: short-term and long-term effects
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-016-1353-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James F. Doyle, Lui G. Forni |
Abstract |
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is the most common cause of organ dysfunction in critically ill adults, with a single episode of AKI, regardless of stage, carrying a significant morbidity and mortality risk. Since the consensus on AKI nomenclature has been reached, data reflecting outcomes have become more apparent allowing investigation of both short- and long-term outcomes.Classically the short-term effects of AKI can be thought of as those reflecting an acute deterioration in renal function per se. However, the effects of AKI, especially with regard to distant organ function ("organ cross-talk"), are being elucidated as is the increased susceptibility to other conditions. With regards to the long-term effects, the consideration that outcome is a simple binary endpoint of dialysis or not, or survival or not, is overly simplistic, with the reality being much more complex.Also discussed are currently available treatment strategies to mitigate these adverse effects, as they have the potential to improve patient outcome and provide considerable economic health savings. Moving forward, an agreement for defining renal recovery is warranted if we are to assess and extrapolate the efficacy of novel therapies. Future research should focus on targeted therapies assessed by measure of long-term outcomes. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 12 | 15% |
Spain | 4 | 5% |
Mexico | 3 | 4% |
Malaysia | 3 | 4% |
Colombia | 3 | 4% |
United States | 3 | 4% |
France | 3 | 4% |
Argentina | 3 | 4% |
Saudi Arabia | 3 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 17% |
Unknown | 28 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 50 | 64% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 29% |
Scientists | 3 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 259 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 36 | 14% |
Researcher | 33 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
Student > Master | 26 | 10% |
Other | 25 | 10% |
Other | 59 | 23% |
Unknown | 54 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 138 | 53% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 3% |
Engineering | 7 | 3% |
Other | 20 | 8% |
Unknown | 63 | 24% |