| Title |
Blood purification therapy with a hemodiafilter featuring enhanced adsorptive properties for cytokine removal in patients presenting COVID-19: a pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03322-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gianluca Villa, Stefano Romagnoli, Silvia De Rosa, Massimiliano Greco, Marco Resta, Diego Pomarè Montin, Federico Prato, Francesco Patera, Fiorenza Ferrari, Giuseppe Rotondo, Claudio Ronco |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 4 | 15% |
| Spain | 3 | 12% |
| Mexico | 3 | 12% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 23% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 159 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 52 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 57 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,581,568
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,389
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,343
of 435,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#33
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.