↓ Skip to main content

Understanding health systems, health economies and globalization: the need for social science perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding health systems, health economies and globalization: the need for social science perspectives
Published in
Globalization and Health, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-8-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan F Murray, Ramila Bisht, Rama Baru, Emma Pitchforth

Abstract

The complex relationship between globalization and health calls for research from many disciplinary and methodological perspectives. This editorial gives an overview of the content trajectory of the interdisciplinary journal 'Globalization and Health' over the first six years of production, 2005 to 2010. The findings show that bio-medical and population health perspectives have been dominant but that social science perspectives have become more evident in recent years. The types of paper published have also changed, with a growing proportion of empirical studies. A special issue on 'Health systems, health economies and globalization: social science perspectives' is introduced, a collection of contributions written from the vantage points of economics, political science, psychology, sociology, business studies, social policy and research policy. The papers concern a range of issues pertaining to the globalization of healthcare markets and governance and regulation issues. They highlight the important contribution that can be made by the social sciences to this field, and also the practical and methodological challenges implicit in the study of globalization and health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 66 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 23%
Student > Master 11 16%
Researcher 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 22 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 11 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,409,954
of 24,900,093 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#634
of 1,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,958
of 177,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,900,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them