↓ Skip to main content

CaPSID: A bioinformatics platform for computational pathogen sequence identification in human genomes and transcriptomes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CaPSID: A bioinformatics platform for computational pathogen sequence identification in human genomes and transcriptomes
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-13-206
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivan Borozan, Shane Wilson, Paola Blanchette, Philippe Laflamme, Stuart N Watt, Paul M Krzyzanowski, Fabrice Sircoulomb, Robert Rottapel, Philip E Branton, Vincent Ferretti

Abstract

It is now well established that nearly 20% of human cancers are caused by infectious agents, and the list of human oncogenic pathogens will grow in the future for a variety of cancer types. Whole tumor transcriptome and genome sequencing by next-generation sequencing technologies presents an unparalleled opportunity for pathogen detection and discovery in human tissues but requires development of new genome-wide bioinformatics tools.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 8%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
India 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
China 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 81 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 21%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 6 6%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 16%
Computer Science 11 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 11 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2012.
All research outputs
#2,947,630
of 24,588,574 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#910
of 7,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,071
of 175,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#11
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,588,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.