↓ Skip to main content

Rationale, study design, and analysis plan of the Alveolar Recruitment for ARDS Trial (ART): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rationale, study design, and analysis plan of the Alveolar Recruitment for ARDS Trial (ART): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-153
Pubmed ID
Authors

The ART Investigators

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high in-hospital mortality. Alveolar recruitment followed by ventilation at optimal titrated PEEP may reduce ventilator-induced lung injury and improve oxygenation in patients with ARDS, but the effects on mortality and other clinical outcomes remain unknown. This article reports the rationale, study design, and analysis plan of the Alveolar Recruitment for ARDS Trial (ART).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 158 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 20%
Other 21 13%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 41 25%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Engineering 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 33 20%