You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Recovering together: building resiliency in dyads of stroke patients and their caregivers at risk for chronic emotional distress; a feasibility study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40814-020-00615-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah Bannon, Ethan G. Lester, Melissa V. Gates, Jessica McCurley, Ann Lin, Jonathan Rosand, Ana-Maria Vranceanu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 161 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
Student > Master | 12 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 14% |
Unknown | 73 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 24 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 13% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 6% |
Unknown | 75 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,525,501
of 23,248,929 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#143
of 1,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,495
of 393,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#8
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,248,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.