| Title |
Use, adoption, and effectiveness of tippy-tap handwashing station in promoting hand hygiene practices in resource-limited settings: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-09101-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Balwani Chingatichifwe Mbakaya, Fatch Welcome Kalembo, Maggie Zgambo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | 3 | 60% |
| Uganda | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 16% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 48 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 52 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,090,111
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,311
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,352
of 402,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#173
of 364 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 364 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.