↓ Skip to main content

Comparative carcinogenicity study of a thick, straight-type and a thin, tangled-type multi-walled carbon nanotube administered by intra-tracheal instillation in the rat

Overview of attention for article published in Particle and Fibre Toxicology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative carcinogenicity study of a thick, straight-type and a thin, tangled-type multi-walled carbon nanotube administered by intra-tracheal instillation in the rat
Published in
Particle and Fibre Toxicology, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12989-020-00382-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dina Mourad Saleh, William T. Alexander, Takamasa Numano, Omnia Hosny Mohamed Ahmed, Sivagami Gunasekaran, David B. Alexander, Mohamed Abdelgied, Ahmed M. El-Gazzar, Hiroshi Takase, Jiegou Xu, Aya Naiki-Ito, Satoru Takahashi, Akihiko Hirose, Makoto Ohnishi, Jun Kanno, Hiroyuki Tsuda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 33%
Other 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Chemistry 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,234,986
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#246
of 608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,263
of 423,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.