You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Latent-space embedding of expression data identifies gene signatures from sputum samples of asthmatic patients
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2020
Shaoke Lou, Tianxiao Li, Daniel Spakowicz, Xiting Yan, Geoffrey Lowell Chupp, Mark Gerstein
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||13%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||14%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||2||10%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||10%|
|Student > Master||2||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||10%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||2||10%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,248,929 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
of 7,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 415,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,248,929 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.