| Title |
Forgoing life-sustaining treatment – a comparative analysis of regulations in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and England
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-020-00535-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miho Tanaka, Satoshi Kodama, Ilhak Lee, Richard Huxtable, Yicheng Chung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,669,727
of 25,315,460 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#637
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,467
of 425,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#20
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,315,460 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.