You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of root resorption after comprehensive orthodontic treatment using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): a meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Oral Health, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12903-018-0579-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yaqi Deng, Yannan Sun, Tianmin Xu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 148 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 64 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 45% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,065,009
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#478
of 1,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,339
of 333,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#18
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.