You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Herbal medicine use in the districts of Nakapiripirit, Pallisa, Kanungu, and Mukono in Uganda
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-8-35 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John RS Tabuti, Collins B Kukunda, Daniel Kaweesi, Ossy MJ Kasilo |
Abstract |
Traditional medicine (TM) occupies a special place in the management of diseases in Uganda. Not with standing the many people relying on TM, indigenous knowledge (IK) related to TM is getting steadily eroded. To slow down this loss it is necessary to document and conserve as much of the knowledge as possible. This study was conducted to document the IK relevant to traditional medicine in the districts of Mukono, Nakapiripirit, Kanungu and Pallisa, in Uganda. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Uganda | 2 | 29% |
United States | 2 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Uganda | 2 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 259 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 47 | 18% |
Student > Master | 36 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 8% |
Researcher | 18 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 6% |
Other | 40 | 15% |
Unknown | 85 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 18% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 35 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 6% |
Chemistry | 10 | 4% |
Other | 39 | 15% |
Unknown | 95 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,966,203
of 24,541,341 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#94
of 765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,591
of 174,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,541,341 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.