You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol for an economic evaluation and budget impact assessment of a randomised, stepped-wedge controlled trial for practice change support to increase routine provision of antenatal care for maternal alcohol consumption
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s43058-020-00079-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Penny Reeves, Zoe Szewczyk, Melanie Kingsland, Emma Doherty, Elizabeth Elliott, Adrian Dunlop, Andrew Searles, John Wiggers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2020.
All research outputs
#18,761,080
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#374
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,013
of 415,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#34
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.