↓ Skip to main content

Identifying competing interest disclosures in systematic reviews of surgical interventions and devices: a cross-sectional survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying competing interest disclosures in systematic reviews of surgical interventions and devices: a cross-sectional survey
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12874-020-01144-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiajie Yu, Guanyue Su, Allison Hirst, Zhengyue Yang, You Zhang, Youping Li

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 5 71%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2020.
All research outputs
#11,659,584
of 19,191,572 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,185
of 1,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,030
of 388,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#173
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,191,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.