↓ Skip to main content

Enhancers reside in a unique epigenetic environment during early zebrafish development

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhancers reside in a unique epigenetic environment during early zebrafish development
Published in
Genome Biology, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13059-016-1013-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas J. T. Kaaij, Michal Mokry, Meng Zhou, Michael Musheev, Geert Geeven, Adrien S. J. Melquiond, António M. de Jesus Domingues, Wouter de Laat, Christof Niehrs, Andrew D. Smith, René F. Ketting

Abstract

Enhancers, not promoters, are the most dynamic in their DNA methylation status throughout development and differentiation. Generally speaking, enhancers that are primed to or actually drive gene expression are characterized by relatively low levels of DNA methylation (hypo-methylation), while inactive enhancers display hyper-methylation of the underlying DNA. The direct functional significance of the DNA methylation state of enhancers is, however, unclear for most loci. In contrast to conventional epigenetic interactions at enhancers, we find that DNA methylation status and enhancer activity during early zebrafish development display very unusual correlation characteristics: hypo-methylation is a unique feature of primed enhancers whereas active enhancers are generally hyper-methylated. The hypo-methylated enhancers that we identify (hypo-enhancers) are enriched close to important transcription factors that act later in development. Interestingly, hypo-enhancers are de-methylated shortly before the midblastula transition and reside in a unique epigenetic environment. Finally, we demonstrate that hypo-enhancers do become active at later developmental stages and that they are physically associated with the transcriptional start site of target genes, irrespective of target gene activity. We demonstrate that early development in zebrafish embodies a time window characterized by non-canonical DNA methylation-enhancer relationships, including global DNA hypo-methylation of inactive enhancers and DNA hyper-methylation of active enhancers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 100 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 22%
Researcher 23 21%
Student > Master 16 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 33%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 16 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,047,002
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,232
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,436
of 370,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#48
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.