You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of guidelines to assist organisations to support employees returning to work after an episode of anxiety, depression or a related disorder: a Delphi consensus study with Australian professionals and consumers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-12-135 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicola J Reavley, Anna Ross, Eoin J Killackey, Anthony F Jorm |
| Abstract |
Mental disorders are a significant cause of disability and loss of workplace productivity. The scientific evidence for how organisations should best support those returning to work after common mental disorders is relatively limited. Therefore a Delphi expert consensus study was carried out with professional and consumer experts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 17% |
| Researcher | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 12% |
| Librarian | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 25 | 20% |
| Psychology | 25 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2012.
All research outputs
#14,605,487
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,134
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,112
of 169,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#63
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.