You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Scale up, optimization and stability analysis of Curcumin C3 complex-loaded nanoparticles for cancer therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-10-38 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amalendu P Ranjan, Anindita Mukerjee, Lawrence Helson, Jamboor K Vishwanatha |
| Abstract |
Nanoparticle based delivery of anticancer drugs have been widely investigated. However, a very important process for Research & Development in any pharmaceutical industry is scaling nanoparticle formulation techniques so as to produce large batches for preclinical and clinical trials. This process is not only critical but also difficult as it involves various formulation parameters to be modulated all in the same process. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 23 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 16 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 33 | 20% |
| Unknown | 33 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2012.
All research outputs
#15,249,959
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#645
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,254
of 170,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.