↓ Skip to main content

CerealsDB 2.0: an integrated resource for plant breeders and scientists

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CerealsDB 2.0: an integrated resource for plant breeders and scientists
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-13-219
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul A Wilkinson, Mark O Winfield, Gary LA Barker, Alexandra M Allen, Amanda Burridge, Jane A Coghill, Keith J Edwards

Abstract

Food security is an issue that has come under renewed scrutiny amidst concerns that substantial yield increases in cereal crops are required to feed the world's booming population. Wheat is of fundamental importance in this regard being one of the three most important crops for both human consumption and livestock feed; however, increase in crop yields have not kept pace with the demands of a growing world population. In order to address this issue, plant breeders require new molecular tools to help them identify genes for important agronomic traits that can be introduced into elite varieties. Studies of the genome using next-generation sequencing enable the identification of molecular markers such as single nucleotide polymorphisms that may be used by breeders to identify and follow genes when breeding new varieties. The development and application of next-generation sequencing technologies has made the characterisation of SNP markers in wheat relatively cheap and straightforward. There is a growing need for the widespread dissemination of this information to plant breeders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 112 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 28%
Researcher 30 25%
Student > Master 12 10%
Other 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Computer Science 6 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2016.
All research outputs
#14,150,222
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#4,711
of 7,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,054
of 169,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#54
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.