You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Engaging with economic evaluation methods: insights from small and medium enterprises in the UK medical devices industry after training workshops
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-10-29 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael P Craven, Matthew J Allsop, Stephen P Morgan, Jennifer L Martin |
| Abstract |
With increased governmental interest in value assessment of technologies and where medical device manufacturers are finding it increasingly necessary to become more familiar with economic evaluation methods, the study sought to explore the levels of health economics knowledge within small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and to scope strategies they employ to demonstrate the value of their products to purchasers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 22% |
| Unknown | 17 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 20% |
| Engineering | 11 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2015.
All research outputs
#6,381,113
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#755
of 1,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,150
of 169,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.